Quantcast
Channel: Hillary Clinton
Viewing all 4067 articles
Browse latest View live

The 11 Most Memorable Moments In Presidential Debate History

$
0
0

rick perry

President Obama and Mitt Romney are locked in intense final preparations for Wednesday's presidential debate in Denver, the first of three scheduled face-offs in the final five weeks of the campaign.

Romney is falling behind in many polls — especially in swing states like Ohio and Florida, which are expected to decide the November election — and many political strategists say his first televised showdown with Obama is one of his last big chances to regain momentum.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) says that Romney "hasn't had a good two weeks," but that his fellow Republican will turn the race "upside down" in Colorado. And indeed, history shows that presidential (and vice presidential) debates can be game-changers — for better or worse.

Here, 11 of the most indelible debate exchanges ever:

1. Kennedy vs. Nixon (1960)

The first televised presidential debate ever proved that these exchanges can turn the tide in a close election. In 1960, Sen. John F. Kennedy challenged Vice President Richard Nixon to a televised debate. Nixon had just gotten out of the hospital. With pancake makeup covering his five o'clock shadow, the Republican sweated under the hot lights and "looked shifty and pale," says Lois Romano at Politico. Kennedy, who had been touring California in open motorcades, looked like a "bronze warrior." Radio listeners gave the night to Nixon, but the 70 million watching on TV said Kennedy won, hands down. They went into the night tied, but Kennedy promptly surged into the lead.



2. Ford vs. Carter (1976)

After 1960, "Nixon never debated again — nor did Lyndon Johnson, who had preceded him to the White House," says CBS News. "So there were no debates in 1964, 1968, or 1972." But in 1976, President Gerald Ford consented to square off against his challenger, Jimmy Carter, because the Democrat was leading him by double digits in the polls. The move backfired, though, when Ford said: "There is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe." It was the height of the Cold War, and the Soviet Union's Iron Curtain stretched across Europe. Moderator Max Frankel of The New York Times looked shocked, saying, "I'm sorry, what?"



3. Carter vs. Reagan (1980)

When Carter was running for re-election, he said he wanted a national health insurance program, but that his opponent, Ronald Reagan, typically opposed the idea. That opened the door for Reagan to deliver one of his most memorable lines: "There you go again," said a smiling Reagan. That quip, says John Harwood at The New York Times, "reassured Americans that he was not the extremist" Carter was warning about. And Reagan got such a boost in the polls that he used the line again four years later against Walter Mondale.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.


Jon Stewart Slams The Obama Administration For Contradicting Itself Over And Over On The Libya Attack

$
0
0

Jon Stewart became the latest friendly foe to the Obama administration on Libya, slamming the president and White House on Monday's "Daily Show" for contradicting its response to the attack that killed a U.S. ambassador there in September

Stewart's segment was entitled, "Do You Guys Ever Talk To Each Other, Or...?" He then pointed out how the answer was almost always "no."

Stewart started with a briefing from Press Secretary Jay Carney immediately after the attack, in which he suggested that the attacks were not pre-planned and blamed it on a trailer for the film "Innocence of Muslims."

"Yeah, that thing's like The Ring," Stewart said. "Three days after you watch it, embassies just burst into flames."

Then on Sept. 16, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice made the Sunday talk show rounds and again said the attack was spontaneous. "On the eighth day," Stewart said, National Counterterrorism Center Director Matthew Olsen declared that it was a "terrorist attack on our embassy."

That, by itself, would be fine. But then Stewart pointed to a number of others within the administration — including President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton — that continued to contradict one another.

“Well, two things apparently have become clear,” Stewart said. “The attack on our embassy was planned and coordinated. The response to it — not so much.”

Watch the video below:

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Here Are Some Of The Most Shocking Things Obama And Romney Have Said In Other Debates

$
0
0

Romney bet

The wait is nearly over. On Wednesday night in Denver, President Obama and Mitt Romney will finally face off in the first of three presidential debates.

Both candidates have been going to somewhat ridiculous lengths to lower expectations — a game Romney appears to be winning, as a majority of Americans tell pollsters they think Obama will come out on top.

Check out these memorable moments >

Still, plenty of prognosticators believe the GOP challenger will rise to the occasion in what could be a do-or-die moment for his campaign. Of course, both Obama and Romney have plenty of experience on the debate stage, and if history is any guide, both are capable of delivering a knockout performance — or totally screwing up.

Here, four shining, and not so shining, moments in each candidate's debating past.

1. Obama to Hillary Clinton: You're "likable enough"

Obama's charisma proved to be a big asset in his hotly contested race against Hillary Clinton in the 2008 Democratic primary. On the debate stage, his smiles and jokes set him apart from Clinton's more sober, wonkish policy explanations. "Obama's charm fell short," however, in the final debate before New Hampshire's primary, says TIME, when a moderator asked Clinton about voters who were hesitating to back her because they liked Obama more. Obama chimed in, saying, "You're likable enough, Hillary." The "backhanded compliment" backfired, triggering criticism from Clinton supporters that Obama was "cruel and insensitive, and voters handed him a stunning defeat in New Hampshire just a few days later."



2. Who was the first black president?

A debate moderator in 2008 asked Obama, who was on his way to becoming the nation's first black president, whether he agreed with novelist Toni Morrison, who said Bill Clinton was America's "first black president." Awkward! But Obama didn't miss a beat, turning the question into "a brief moment of levity in a contentious slug-fest of a debate," said Katharine Q. Seelye at The New York Times. Obama praised former President Clinton's "affinity" with the black community, then cracked up the crowd by saying: "I would have to investigate more, Bill's dancing abilities and some of this other stuff before I accurately judged whether he was, in fact, a brother."



3. Obama zings Hillary and Bill

In one of the many heated exchanges during the "unusually acrimonious and personal" primary battle between Obama and Clinton, says The Associated Press, Obama tried to defend comments he had made about Republican ideas and how Ronald Reagan had successfully championed them. Hillary Clinton interrupted him, saying that she had never criticized Obama for what he said about Reagan. "Your husband did," said Obama. "I'm here. He's not," Clinton responded. Obama shot back: "Well, I can't tell who I'm running against sometimes."



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.

Powerful Photo Of Obama And Hillary Clinton At The Transfer Ceremony For Americans Who Died In Libya

$
0
0

White House photographer Pete Souza posts this picture of President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton greeting the remains of the four Americans — including U.S. Amb. Christopher Stephens — who died in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. 

obama clinton libya bodies

Both Obama and Clinton have come under fire for their response to those attacks, as details emerge suggesting that the administration failed to respond to a growing terrorist threat in Libya, and declined requests for additional security to protect U.S. personnel there. 

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

HILLARY CLINTON: Blame Me For Libya Security

$
0
0

hillary clinton

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told CNN's Elise Labott on Monday that she "take[s] responsibility" for security at the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, where an attack last month killed four Americans, including U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens.

"I take responsibility," she told CNN. "I'm in charge of the State Department's 60,000-plus people all over the world — 275 posts. The president and the vice president wouldn't be knowledgeable about specific decisions that are made by security professionals. They're the ones who weigh all of the threats and the risks and the needs and make a considered decision."

Clinton's remarks come in the middle of a timeline that has produced political backlash for the Obama administration over its handling of the attacks. Last Thursday during the vice presidential debate, Vice President Joe Biden said that "we weren't told they wanted more security" leading up to the attacks. 

The remarks earned him scrutiny from Republicans, including presidential nominee Mitt Romney, because they appeared to contradict testimony from a regional security officer at a Congressional hearing last week. The White House clarified Friday that Biden's "we" meant the administration, where requests for security would normally not end up.

Clinton's comments also come before Tuesday's second presidential debate between Romney and President Barack Obama. Obama's image on foreign policy has taken a brutal hit in the aftermath of the Libya attacks.

Here's video of Clinton's on CNN in brief, via BuzzFeed's Andrew Kaczynski:

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Hillary Clinton's Most Memorable Moments Captured In Memes

$
0
0

Hillary Clinton party

Hillary Clinton took the fall for the deadly Embassy attacks in Benghazi that left Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans dead.

Twitter is abuzz with other suggestions of what Clinton should take responsibility for, but we thought it was only fair to remind the world (AKA the Internet) of some of Clinton's better, or at least funnier, moments.

Here, our top 11 Hillary memes and moments — these dark days will pass, Hil.

1. Texts From Hillary

Texts From HillaryWho could forget the insta-sensation "Texts from Hillary" memes? Here, one of our favorites, featuring none other than Vice Prez and resident grinner, Joe Biden.



2. Hillary meets TFH creators Stacy Lambe and Adam Smith

Ever the jokester, Hillary went that extra mile to invite the men behind Texts from Hillary to the State Department. She looks like she's having way more fun than they are.



3. Watch Out

Watch Out Hillary memeHillary, did you make this face KNOWING it was going to become a meme? Really.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.

Hillary Clinton Is Tired Of The 'Women Still Can't Have It All' Argument

$
0
0

Hillary Clinton

In a profile by Ayelet Waldman in Marie Claire, Hillary Clinton responded to a question about Anne-Marie Slaughter, who wrote The Atlantic's cover story on why women still can't have it all and once worked for Clinton at the State Department, with some direct words:

"Some women are not comfortable working at the pace and intensity you have to work at in these jobs."

Slaughter was the director of policy planning at the State Department and wrote about quitting the position in part to spend more time with her two teenage sons. In the piece, Slaughter praised her former boss: "Watching Hillary Clinton in action makes me incredibly proud—of her intelligence, expertise, professionalism, charisma, and command of any audience."

And noted of her time at State, "I had it better than many of my peers in D.C.; Secretary Clinton deliberately came in around 8 a.m. and left around 7 p.m., to allow her close staff to have morning and evening time with their families (although of course she worked earlier and later, from home)."

But Waldman writes that Clinton's "disapproval was palpable" when she brought up the story. Clinton touted her own commitment to "enabling women to continue to do high-stress jobs while caring for not only children, but [also] aging parents" but added:

"Other women don't break a sweat. They have four or five, six kids. They're highly organized, they have very supportive networks." ...

"I can't stand whining," she says. "I can't stand the kind of paralysis that some people fall into because they're not happy with the choices they've made. You live in a time when there are endless choices ... Money certainly helps, and having that kind of financial privilege goes a long way, but you don't even have to have money for it. But you have to work on yourself ... Do something!"

The rest of Waldman's profile of Clinton is at Marie Claire.

Please follow War Room on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Russia Wants John Kerry, Not Susan Rice As US Secretary Of State

$
0
0

John Kerry

Russia would like to see US Senator John Kerry replace Hillary Clinton once the US Secretary of State steps down at the start of President Barack Obama's second term, a news report said on Thursday.

US officials said on Wednesday that Mrs Clinton intended to keep her promise to leave the White House administration after the presidential ballot, despite her boss having firmly secured a new four years in office.

Speculation has been rife that Washington's top foreign policy assignment may go to either the Senate Foreign Affairs committee chairman Kerry or Washington's UN ambassador Susan Rice.

An unnamed source in the Russian foreign ministry told the Kommersant business daily that Moscow would "much prefer" to see Mr Kerry take the post.

The source said Ms Rice was viewed as "too ambitious and aggressive" in Russian diplomatic circles. The UN ambassador had fought fiercely with Moscow over its refusal to back firmer action in the Syria crisis in the past year.

"It would be more difficult for Moscow to work with Washington" if Ms Rice became Secretary of State, the unnamed Russian official said.

The source added that Moscow's only fear was that Mr Obama may choose against naming Mr Kerry because this could see the Democratic Party lose an important Senate seat.

Source: AFP

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


Hillary Clinton Is Crushing Joe Biden In An Early Florida 2016 Poll

$
0
0

Hillary Clinton

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton holds an overwhelming lead over the rest of the Democratic field — including Vice President Joe Biden— as the 2016 Democratic front-runner for president in Florida, according to a new survey from Public Policy Polling.

The poll results, shared exclusively with Business Insider, find Clinton grabbing a clear majority — 61% of Florida Democrats pick her as the hypothetical 2016 Democratic nominee. Only 14% of Florida Democrats choose Biden. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo comes in third, earning 8% of the vote.

The poll shows that as two high-profile members of the current Obama administration, Clinton and Biden enjoy the most early name recognition. Clinton has an 82% favorability rating among Florida Democrats, while Biden's favorability rating sits at 74%. Cuomo is the only other candidate about whom the majority of Florida Democrats have an opinion.

Both Biden and Clinton have fanned the flames for 2016. Upon casting his vote in this week's election, Biden didn't rule out voting for himself again, leading to some speculation he's considering a run.

Clinton, meanwhile, has brushed aside any questions she might be planning to make a second bid after a 2008 Democratic primary loss to President Barack Obama. But she has enjoyed high approval ratings during her time as Secretary of State, and she has become incredibly popular this year.

If Clinton doesn't run, Biden would jump into front-runner status with 38% of the vote to Cuomo's 22%. If neither Clinton nor Biden ran, Cuomo would garner 33% of the vote — but 42% of Florida Democrats said they would choose someone else or weren't sure in that hypothetical question. 

Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley and newly elected Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warrenboth of whom have been speculated about — get only 3% and 1% of the vote, the poll finds.

There's no gender gap here — both men and women would prefer Clinton to be the 2016 nominee. In fact, Biden earns even less support among Florida Democratic men than he does among women. That's probably because of his natural charm with women.

The combined way-too-early results in Florida show that voters would like to see a 2016 race between Clinton and Jeb Bush, whose last names would give the race a 1992 feel.

Check out the full results of the Republican Florida poll here >

And here are the full Democratic results:

Florida Democrats 2016

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Never Underestimate Hillary Clinton

$
0
0

Hillary ClintonHillary Clinton, as secretary of state, has been prevented from taking an active part in the presidential campaign. But, as Alex Spillius writes, she has been a unsung hero of Obama's re-election.

The first phone call Barack Obama placed after Mitt Romney had conceded defeat late on Tuesday night was to Bill Clinton, to thank him for his sterling work as a campaigner on the Democratic candidate’s behalf.

But the freshly re-elected president would have been equally justified in making that call to the other Clinton – Hillary, his secretary of state – who, against the odds, has proved to be the greatest asset in his administration.

Once Mr Obama’s nemesis, Mrs Clinton is now not only a close colleague but, it appears, a friend.

Protocol dictated that they should accompany each other to Andrews Air Force base in September to receive the bodies of the four Americans killed in the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi. It did not dictate that Mrs Clinton should squeeze the president’s hand after he had paid tribute to the fallen, or that he should put his arm around her waist as they stepped down from the podium.

What a contrast with 2008, when they repeatedly exchanged verbal – if not physical – blows as Mr Obama stunned the Clinton camp with his audacious capture of the Democratic nomination. To then offer his former rival the job of America’s top diplomat was a masterstroke of conflict resolution.

Mrs Clinton responded by carrying out her duties with a degree of commitment, dependability and flair that has earned her near universal admiration at home and abroad.

She has shaped and executed policy on the major issues with a mixture of adept public diplomacy and effective private arm-twisting, often drawing on contacts made during her eight years as First Lady.

In one telling recent episode, she learnt that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, was going to be interviewed on more than one high-profile Sunday news show about Iran. Concerned that he would either exacerbate his already prickly relationship with Mr Obama or inflame international tension, or both, she contacted him directly.

During a 25-minute phone call, she reassured him that the US was firm in its commitment to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon. His tone was duly more measured than on previous visits. “I have known Bibi a long time,” she told an American newspaper later, using the Israeli’s nickname. “I consider him a friend.”

She has been central to the administration’s “pivot” to Asia designed to counter China’s looming presence in the region. At her insistence, the Chinese have not been berated over human rights, but she has openly warned them against using force in their disputes over islands in the South China Sea.

Mrs Clinton was a leading voice for the successful intervention in Libya, and has maintained pressure on Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and the Iranian theocracy. She has been an unfailingly loyal soldier to her boss. The internal rivalries and personality clashes that marked her husband’s White House, and her 2008 campaign to a lesser extent, have been notable by their absence from her relations with her subordinates and with the White House.

As secretary of state, Mrs Clinton was barred from an active role in the campaign, but she craftily used her busy travel schedule to help Mr Obama fend off attacks from Mr Romney, who tried to portray the president as an apologist for American pre-eminence.

Steve Schmidt, a leading Republican strategist, described her as a “big shield for the president on any number of issues”.

None more so than Benghazi. As the administration faced growing questions about security at the consulate and why it had offered no explanations for the violence, Mrs Clinton took the heat off her boss.

The day before Mr Obama’s third and final debate with Mr Romney, on foreign policy, she said that the buck for the incident stopped with her.

“I take responsibility. I am responsible for diplomats,” she said.

Her intervention came at a crucial phase of the campaign. Mr Obama had potentially wrecked his re-election bid with a lifeless performance in the first debate. He had recovered somewhat in the second but needed to win the third convincingly. He did so, partly because Mr Romney thought better of tackling him on Benghazi after Mrs Clinton had drawn his fire.

If and when the full facts about Benghazi are known, they may well blot her copybook. But for now, Mrs Clinton is not only the best known but the most popular member of the Obama team with the American public.

Women, who contributed heavily to Mr Obama’s victory, generally love her. She and Bill have shaken off the bad memories from their 1990s occupation of the White House – her failed health care reform, his impeachment over the Monica Lewinsky affair.

Among moderate Democrats and independent voters she has higher favourable ratings than the president, though she benefits from a day job that removes her from most of Washington’s wrangling.

It is no surprise, then, that friends are urging her to make another bid for the White House in 2016, when Mr Obama will reach his two-term limit.

“They are convinced she would have a very, very good chance,” said a former official in the White House. Mrs Clinton has said little that would effectively quell the conjecture in Washington. She recently said she had “ruled out” the possibility but in the same breath said she would “always want to be in service to my country”.

Her husband happily stoked speculation by describing her as the best public servant he had ever seen. “She’s an extraordinarily able person. I’ve never met anybody I thought was any better than her at this,” he said.

Certainly Mrs Clinton’s international counterparts would not be surprised to be meeting her in the Oval Office in four years’ time.

During a state dinner in China, she was reportedly told by a senior official that “you will be still young when you are president”.

At 65 now, that may be true in the Chinese context. But Mrs Clinton knows very well how long and how punishing an American election campaign can be, especially when you lose and especially if you will be pushing 70.

The former White House official thinks she may baulk at another bid.

“She would spend an enormous amount of time reliving the most unpleasant time of her life, hoping for a different outcome. She is the subject of universal love right now. Would she really want to give that away?”

Clinton insiders, and her husband, insist she has not yet made up her mind. Before the election, she repeatedly said she would stand down as secretary of state early in a second term, write a book and enjoy a rest.

Recently she has hinted at staying on a bit longer, at least until an investigation of Benghazi is resolved.

As both she and Bill have shown time and time again, it is hard to keep a Clinton down.

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Neither Hillary Clinton Nor David Petraeus Will Testify At Benghazi Hearings

$
0
0

petraeus and clinton

Today, Congress embarks upon a week of hearings and in order to determine what actually occurred in the September 11 attacks on Benghazi.

However, it appears that two of the most important and knowledgeable sources will not be testifying. 

Former CIA director David Petraeus, who resigned on Friday when an FBI investigation uncovered evidence of his extramarital affair, will no longer appear before lawmakers. His interim replacement, Mike Morrel, will testify on the CIA's behalf.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who has come under serious flak for allegedly ignoring requests to beef up security at the Benghazi consulate prior to its attack, will not testify as well. "She was asked to appear at House Foreign Affairs next week, and we have written back to the Chairman to say that she’ll be on travel next week,"State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland told reporters on Friday. Under Secretary Patrick Kennedy and Assistant Secretary Eric Boswell, two top ranking officials at State, will appear at the hearings in her stead.

Clinton will be in Australia to attend the annual Australia-United States Ministerial (AUSMIN) consultations.  Rumors have circulated — which both sides have rebuffed — that the United States is concerned with possible budget cuts to the Australian military. The U.S. sees Australia as a strong counterweight to the growing military powers in the Pacific, including China.

Both Petraeus and Clinton would have testified in closed sessions.

While the replacements chosen to appear before congress are very high-level experts, some lawmakers and observers are not pleased that neither Clinton nor Petraeus will show in what some have deemed an extensive cover up by the Obama administration.

Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, told Clinton it was "disappointing that we have yet to receive any response from your Department and that we are receiving more information from the press than from the Administration,"in a letter last week.

And conservative media mogul Rupert Murdoch tweeted the following:

PETRAEUS COLLEAGUE: Biographer Paula Broadwell 'Got Her Claws Into Him' >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Major Hillary Clinton Fundraiser Says Citizens United Doesn't Go Far Enough

$
0
0

hillary clinton pensive tbi

In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United that corporations can spend freely on political campaigns through independent groups such as "super PACS."

But it's still illegal for corporations to give directly to candidates.

William Danielczyk, who was indicted last year for allegedly funneling money to Hillary Clinton's campaigns, wants to change all that, Reuters' Allison Frankel reports.

The Innolog Holdings CEO recently petitioned the Supreme Court to end a ban on direct contributions to campaigns by corporations.

Danielczyk raised about $180,000 for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign in 2008 and her 2006 Senate race. However, many of those checks came from Republicans he allegedly reimbursed, the Wall Street Journal has reported.

Now, he's arguing to the Supreme Court that the direct campaign donations that got him in trouble are essentially the same as the indirect donations allowed under Citizens United.

Frankel writes:

The bar on direct corporate giving was intended to prevent businesses from corrupting the political process, yet according to Danielczyk, the risk of corruption is no more severe through direct corporate contributions than it is through the independent expenditures (or gifts from wealthy individuals) that the Supreme Court sanctioned in Citizens United.

SEE ALSO: Montana Voters Overwhelmingly Said Corporations Aren't People >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Why Hillary Clinton Should Be Our Next Treasury Secretary

$
0
0

Hillary Clinton

The chatter over who will the next Treasury Secretary has heated up now that the election is behind us. Given that the position will likely be—as things stand right now—central to the nation’s next four years, the attention is understandable and warranted.

Much of the talk seems to focus on the traditional discussion about the attributes a Treasury Secretary should typically have. Wall Street or Main Street? Public sector background or private sector background? I think this approach leans us in the wrong direction. Instead, we should focus on what we need now. And today’s context is fiscal and political, not financial and technocratic.

The last four years, actually five, were about financial repair. The Treasury Secretary was in triage mode, trying to fix the plumbing of our financial system and trying to support an environment that would allow balance sheets to heal ASAP. You wanted someone with deep financial expertise.

Today, as I see it, our future challenges will be predominately fiscal, not financial. Fiscal issues are profoundly political. And the only path to sound fiscal policy runs straight through Capitol Hill.

We all know, at some level, we need a deep fix of our entitlement commitments. I am tempted to repurpose Churchill’s famous WWII phrase when I think about aging Americans and our entitlements we have built up over a generation: “Never was so much owed by so many to so few”.

We also have a revenue problem. Revenue as a share of GDP is just too low by historical standards. And, unlike spending to GDP, Rev/GDP, because of the way the math works, will not improve that much as the cycle improves (Revenue is positively correlated to GDP through a cycle, whereas counter-cyclical stabilizers make spending negatively correlated to GDP through the cycle).

Revenue is a difficult issue, not just for fundamental reasons, but also for behavioral ones. Two jump to mind. One, taxes are painful. We perceive immediate pain in exchange for future, often intangible benefits that are hard to perceive. And this often makes taxpayers resentful and, at times, indignant. The second problem is our resentfulness makes us susceptible to almost any economic theory that allows us to stave off paying more taxes. The phrase “never get in between someone and what they what to believe” comes to mind here.

Lastly, we need structural reform to compete globally. The last 20 years of credit expansion made us flabby. The faux prosperity that came from household leverage and financial engineering papered over declining competitiveness. Many of the relevant issues lay beyond a Treasury Secretary’s remit. But many of them, such as corporate tax reform, do not. And these issues too are highly political.

The other large issue area that will continue to be important is international relations. Economic policy long ago stopped being a domestic issue area. The world is getting smaller, our trading partners are getting wealthier, global competition is fiercer than ever, and the world’s international economic infrastructure is at the leading edge of an overhaul to reflect these emerging realities. This overhaul matters critically to us, as raw imposition of our will is no longer a viable alternative.

The ideal candidate, therefore, is someone who meets these basic criteria:

—Has the strong trust and confidence of the President. No freelancers or peacocks need apply.

—Excellent political skills. Well respected by Congress.

—Knows where the bodies are buried on Capitol Hill; knows where are the hot buttons are for the key players.

—Strong international experience and knowledge of the international political landscape, plus diplomatic ability.

It may be controversial to suggest at this point in time that deep financial expertise is not a principal criterion for Treasury Secretary. And the assertion that it doesn’t really matter whether a particular candidate has or hasn’t met a payroll might not sit well with many. But, if you believe, as I do, that the next four years will be all about fiscal and structural issues, and that our ability to shape international economic relations will only grow more important, than we have to get past the backward-looking temptation to root for a financial wizard or green-eyeshade type. We need a politician, one with international street cred.

Who might that be? Well, it is easier to look at the presumed front runners and say who it is not. But when I look around, the far and away best candidate is one who probably doesn’t want the job: Hillary Clinton.

Read more Mark Dow at his blog Behavioural Macro >

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

We Spotted A 'Hillary Clinton Shop' In Rural Tanzania

$
0
0

We spotted this sign on a roadside cart in Karatu, a town outside the Ngorongoro Conservation Area in northern Tanzania.

The "Hillary Clinton Shop" appears to sell beaded Maasai necklaces, carved masks, and other souvenirs.

hillar clinton shop

Disclosure: Our trip to Tanzania, including travel and lodging expenses, was sponsored by the Tanzania Tourist Board, Africa Adventure Company, Singita Grumeti Group, Coastal Aviation, Qatar Airways, Tanzania National Parks, Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority and Wildlife Division.

SEE ALSO: You've Never Seen Anything Like This Luxury Hotel On A Tanzanian Crater

Please follow The Life on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Barbara Walters Just Announced Her '10 Most Fascinating People' Of 2012

$
0
0

barbara walters

On Monday's "The View,"Barbara Walters revealed her annual list of "The 10 Most Fascinating People" of the year.

The 83-year-old journalist explained that she chose people who have been "very much in the news" and ensured viewers, "no criminals."

While Walters drew criticism for having the Kardashians on her list last year, this year's line up is sure to draw some jeers, as well as cheers.

See seven of her ten picks below:

10. One Direction, Best-selling English-Irish boy band

9. Gabby Douglas, U.S. Olympic gold medalist

8.  Chris Christie, Governor of New Jersey

7. E.L. James, "Fifty Shades of Grey" author

6. Seth MacFarlane, Oscars host and "Ted" director

5. Ben Affleck, "Argo" star and director

4. Hillary Clinton, U.S. Secretary of State

... and the remaining three remain a mystery, set to be revealed in the Barbara Walters special airing December 12 on ABC.

Who do YOU think is the number one most fascinating person of 2012?

SEE ALSO: The 10 media companies that control America's news >

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


Hillary Clinton Is Heading To The Mideast To Deal With The Gaza Crisis

$
0
0

hillary clinton

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will leave Asia on Tuesday to visit Israel, Egypt and Ramallah, stepping up US efforts to avoid a worsening of the Gaza crisis, an official said.

Clinton will meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and discuss the crisis with Egyptian and Palestinian leaders, after leaving President Barack Obama's trip to Southeast Asia, said senior Obama aide Ben Rhodes.

Obama made the decision to send Clinton after speaking to Netanyahu and twice to Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi, after leaving East Asia summit meetings on Monday night, said Rhodes, a deputy national security adviser.

The US president, on a mission to reinforce his foreign policy pivot to Asia, has made repeated calls to Middle Eastern leaders in recent days about a crisis which he says was precipitated by Hamas rocket fire from Gaza into Israel.

Rhodes said Clinton would express the US interest in a peaceful outcome that protects and enhances Israel's security and regional stability, though he stopped short of calling her trip a mediating mission.

"The best way to solve this is through diplomacy, so that you have a peaceful settlement that ends that rocket fire and allows for a broader calm in the region," Rhodes said.

News of Clinton's trip came as Israeli leaders Tuesday discussed an Egyptian plan for a truce with Gaza's ruling Hamas militant group, and after the death toll from Israeli raids on the enclave rose to more than 100.

Senior Israeli ministers decided overnight to delay any ground invasion of the Gaza Strip to give Egyptian-led truce efforts a chance to work.

Palestinian officials said Clinton would visit Ramallah in the West Bank on Wednesday morning for talks with Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas.

US officials did not say exactly who Clinton would meet in Egypt. But Rhodes said Morsi's Muslim Brotherhood government, which has close ties to Hamas, was playing a useful role in trying to calm the situation down.

"The president and the secretary believe that the Egyptians have been quite constructive in the conversations we have had," Rhodes said.

"They have expressed a sincere commitment to support a de-escalation here."

Clinton's arrival in the region will add to a flurry of diplomacy aimed at ending a worsening of the crisis which could further destabilise the turbulent Middle East.

UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon, who has been in Cairo, is in contact with Clinton, US officials said.

Hamas chief Khaled Meshaal meanwhile said his movement was committed to trying to secure a truce with Israel, but insisted it must lift its six-year blockade of the Gaza Strip.

Egypt is leading efforts to mediate the truce, chairing marathon indirect negotiations in Cairo between Meshaal and an Israeli envoy.

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Hillary Clinton Is Absolutely Dominating The Middle East Right Now

$
0
0

Hillary Clinton

As her tenure as Secretary of State draws to a close, Hillary Clinton is going on an absolute tear across the Middle East.

She made a number of controversial comments during a foreign policy forum in Washington, hosted by the Saban Center for Middle East Policy.

We'll start with her position on Israel:

Despite the fact that the country agreed to loosen its choke-hold on the Gaza Strip, Hillary is still hammering Netanyahu on his refusal to curb Israeli settlements—3,000 of which are still approved for construction. Clinton made the comments following the U.N.'s historic recognition of Palestine as a 'nonmember state.'

"In light of today's announcement, let me reiterate that this administration — like previous administrations — has been very clear with Israel that these activities set back the cause of a negotiated peace," Clinton said on Friday .

Reporters from Al Jazeera note that both "Avigdor Lieberman, the Israeli foreign minister, and Ehud Barak, defence minister, were in the audience when she made her remarks."

Clinton wasn't done yet though. She then dropped this bomb on Iran's nuclear program: 

"We are working on the P5+1 and making our willingness known that we are ready to have a bilateral discussion if they are every ready to engage," said Clinton.

Though the comments are not far off of what President Barack Obama said just days into his first term, still there's bound to be international push back from any "bilateral" engagements with what many countries have labeled a "state sponsor of terrorism."

Hillary also drew a "red line" in the sand on Syria, reiterating that any use of chemical weapons would result in direct action from the United States.

"I am not going to telegraph any specifics what we would do in the event of credible evidence that the Assad regime has resorted to using chemical weapons against their own people, but suffice to say, we are certainly planning to take action if that eventuality were to occur," she said.

Though she didn't spell out exactly what that action would be, State Department officials told Reuters that there's no intention to instate a 'no fly zone,' indicating that something more aggressive would come into play.

Meanwhile, Russia has aggressively blocked any U.N. sanctions against the Assad regime, and will likely continue to resist American foreign policy in spite of an upcoming vote to install Patriot missiles along the Turkish border.

Clinton's tough stances come on the eve of her largely figurehead role in the Israel-Gaza peace talks. Morsi, who took the lead, has since sought to seize more power in the wake of his success in Gaza—to which Clinton urged that power should not be "concentrated in too few hands."

The fact remains though, right at the moment when the Middle East seemed to be coming apart at the seams, Clinton stepped in with some tough talk. It remains to be seen though if that talk will turn into credible action.

NOW SEE: Iran Unveiled A Bunch Of New Toys For Their Naval Exercises >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

An Astounding Number Of Republican Women Would Support Hillary Clinton In 2016

$
0
0

Hillary Clinton

A new Washington Post/ABC News poll finds broad support for a potential 2016 presidential run by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, including a surprising amount of Republican women that say they would support her candidacy.

Overall, 57 percent of the poll's respondents said they would support a Clinton candidacy. That includes 35 percent of Republican women. To put that in perspective, President Barack Obama won just 6 percent of the overall Republican vote this year. Among all women, 66 percent would support Clinton's potential bid in 2016.

Clinton is riding a wave of popularity as she prepares to leave her post as Secretary of State in Obama's second term. Sixty-six percent of adults view her favorably, an all-time high in the poll. This includes 67 percent of self-identified Independents. 

And 68 percent approve of the way she is handling her job as secretary of state. That includes 65 percent of Independents — and 40 percent of Republicans. 

Here's a look, in chart form, of her popularity:

Hillary Clinton

It's clear that at this point, Democrats want Clinton to run. More than 80 percent would support her candidacy, with most of them saying they would "strongly" do so. That runs in line with Public Policy Polling's results of Florida in November, when 61 percent said they would choose her to hypothetically run in 2016. The only other candidates with name recognition at this point were Vice President Joe Biden and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo

Clinton wins the support of Florida Democrats >

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Hillary Could Be The Strongest Frontrunner In Democratic Primary History

$
0
0

I have no clue whether or not Hillary Clintonwill run for the presidency in 2016, but I would argue that she would be the strongest nonincumbent frontrunner in modern history upon inspection of the primary landscape.

1. Clinton's polling at a record 61% in the early primary field

You might wonder how normal that is? It's in another stratosphere.

I went into the Roper archives to examine races where no incumbent was running for re-election, and only Al Gore, at around 55% in early 1997 for the 2000 run, comes anywhere close.

George HW Bush was only around 40% at this point in the 1988 cycle; Bob Dole was near 50% for 1996; and George W Bush was between 20% and 25% in 2000.

Some might be tempted to say that Clinton is only where she is at because she's holding a high-end nonpartisan position (secretary of State). Colin Powell, a candidate who also held a high-end nonpartisan position, was in the mid 20s at this point for a 1996 run, and mid 30s for 2000.

Clinton is also polling well above her 2008 numbers at this point in the campaign. Back in late 2004 and early 2005, Clinton was in the mid 30s to low 40s.

Some may be quick to dismiss early survey data, but almost always, those like Dole, Gore and now Clinton, who poll high this early and run, tend to march to the nomination.

2. Clinton is on her way to winning the endorsement primary

More important than even polling is whether the party establishment backs you. Remember how no one in the grassroots seemed to like Mitt Romney during the primary season? Folk like me thought he was going to win because most primary voters eventually take their cues from party leaders.

If a candidate clearly wins the "invisible primary" (like Reagan in 1980, Mondale in 1984, Bush in 1988, Clinton in 1992, Dole in 1996, etc), then they're almost certainly going to win the nomination.

In 2008, Hillary Clinton failed to overwhelmingly win the invisible primary, even if she had the most endorsements. Both Senate majority leader Harry Reid and then-speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi were looking for an alternative.

Clinton's likely not to have those same issues in 2016. In addition to holding on to her support from 2008, Clinton already has the backing of Nancy Pelosi.

President Obama isn't likely to get in her way, either. He felt such a debt of gratitude to Bill Clinton that he was the first person Obama called after Mitt Romney conceded the 2012 election. Obama continues to play golf with Clinton to this day. Obama and Hillary's working relationship is also solid.

3. Clinton has organization in the early primary states

One of the reasons that Clinton lost in 2008 was due to her loses in key early primary states, Iowa and South Carolina. Obama's campaign simply out-planned Clinton's and had organizations that hers was catching up to.

Take the first-in-the-nation Iowa caucus (and its complicated rules): you need to be able to organize. You need a good get-out-the-vote effort and the ability to win the eventual support from voters whose first candidate doesn't reach the 15% threshold. Obama had it, and Clinton didn't recognize that until it was too late.

This campaign-building has to be done from scratch for most candidates. Clinton already has a foothold in all early primary states, and the later states as well, because of the drawn-out 2008 primary season. That advantage simply can't be understated.

4. Clinton isn't going to make an idiotic statement

A lot of candidates with a lot of promise enter the race with high polling numbers yet fail miserably as candidates. Rick Perry most recently entered the 2012 Republican race with solid polling numbers and much media hoopla. Unfortunately for Perry, he had to open his mouth. Ted Kennedy suffered a similar fate in 1980.

Clinton is no rookie. Anyone who watched the 2008 debates will tell you that, despite having been in the line of fire throughout the 2008 primary, Clinton never made a statement that ruined her candidacy. In fact, outside of one comment about undocumented immigrants and drivers' licenses at a late October 2007 debate, Clinton was a top debater during the 2008 primary season.

5. Clinton's got the demographics on her side

Finally, primaries are about putting together voter coalitions. In 2012, Mitt Romney discovered there were slightly more non-evangelicals than evangelicals voting in Republican primaries.

In 2008, Barack Obama won on the strength of African Americans, college-educated whites and young voters. His coalition was just slightly larger than Clinton's Latinos, non-college-educated whites and women.

The Clinton name is still gold among non-college-educated white Democrats, as witnessed by Obama's deployment of Bill Clinton to win over these voters in 2012. There's not going to be a Latino in the primary field, so one would think Clinton's previous support will hold.

There still hasn't been a woman president, and there's unlikely to be another female running, so Clinton will retain her 2008 levels among women, as well.

Perhaps most importantly, there's not going to be African-American opposition on the same level as Obama. Clinton had been expected to do very well among black voters, even after Barack Obama entered the race. Right now, her support among black Democrats is on par with her support among white Democrats. Even if Clinton only takes 20% to 30% of the black vote, it'll be more than enough to win.

And we haven't even talked about the fact that the Clintons can raise a lot of money.

The fact is, if Clinton runs, she'll be a heavy favorite.

This article originally appeared on guardian.co.uk

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

POLL: Marco Rubio Is The Early Republican Frontrunner For 2016

$
0
0

Marco Rubio

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio is currently as the frontrunner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, according to a new survey from Public Policy Polling

In a crowded field for the nomination, Rubio garners 18 percent of the vote among Republicans surveyed. New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie follows with 16 percent, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and former vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan each earn 12 percent. In an earlier PPP poll of Florida Republicans, Bush and Rubio were tied at the top of the list.

The poll suggests that Rubio is popular with the party's conservative base, while Christie earns more support from its moderates. But PPP director Tom Jensen writes that "there just aren't that many moderates left in the Republican Party."

"Although his cooperation with President Obama in relation to Hurricane Sandy doesn't seem to have hurt him with Republicans in New Jersey, these numbers suggest it has caused some irritation with him outside the state," Jensen writes.

The big difference between Rubio and Christie comes from their favorabilities with the "very conservative" members of the party. A significant 75 percent of self-identified "very conservative" Republicans view Rubio favorably. Only 42 percent said the same of Christie, by far the lowest marks for any Republican candidate. 

But Rubio also earns crossover support. He is viewed favorably among 39 percent of independent voters and has a net-positive favorability rating among all age groups. 

One name that was left out of PPP's poll: Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, who has been making moves to distance himself from the party's run under Mitt Romney and possibly position himself for 2016. 

On the Democratic side, Hillary Clinton continues to dominate the rest of the field. She would lead the field with an astounding 61 percent of the vote. Vice President Joe Biden, the next closest candidate, earns just 12 percent. If neither candidate runs, Democratic voters say they're not sure who they would want.

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Viewing all 4067 articles
Browse latest View live




<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>